What is truth?

Archive for the ‘Dail Debate on institutional child abuse’ Category

Brady “No Accountability”

Brady insists he will not resign over Smyth case
Just like the corrupt politicians this shows that the top clergy are as far removed from the victims as they ever were

There is no sense of accountability only empty platitudes and well rehearsed speeches.

The Farce be with you !

Bishop’s appeal for financial aid

Every one of these pampas pi** will roast in hell before I would put my hand in my pocket to help them stay in their palaces

What cheek they should be in jail and put on the sex registry of the state.

This call again shows that jackass are out of touch with the real world why did they not ask the Pope in Rome when they were there or better still why did they not just stay there they wouldn’t be missed here.

abused over decades


A national memorial will be erected in Ireland for tens of thousands of children who were abused over decades in church-run institutions. So it was claimed to-day .Children’s Minister Barry Andrews said a national day of remembrance for survivors and those who died at the hands of sexual, emotional and physical torture is also being considered.

Mr Andrews insisted the Cabinet has rubber-stamped the 25 million euro (£21.5 million) plan to deal with what he branded a dark passage of Irish history.

Dark is not the word I would use here it is shameful, and what about naming the Minsters who were responsible for allowing these crimes to continue for years

Why are these people not brought before the courts of the land?

They are still enjoying massive pensions when the victims are subject to levies and dole cuts

It’s not enough to say we will do something

Action speaks louder than words, we’ve had enough of false promises!

Liz McManus

Liz McManus
(Wicklow, Labour)

Question 22: To ask the Minister for Education and Science the matters discussed at his meeting on 4 June 2009 with representatives of the religious orders that ran institutions identified in the Ryan report in which children were abused; if the question of additional payments by the orders was discussed; his plans for further meetings with these orders; and if he will make a statement on the matter


Mary Upton
(Dublin South Central, Labour)

Question 24: To ask the Minister for Education and Science if, arising from his public statement on 26 May 2009, he has received a response to his call to the religious congregations to articulate their willingness to make a further substantial voluntary contribution arising from the Ryan report; if a meeting has been arranged with representatives of these congregations; and if he will make a statement on the matter.


Ruairi Quinn
(Dublin South East, Labour)

Question 166: To ask the Minister for Education and Science the matters discussed at his meeting on 4 June 2009 with representatives of the religious orders that ran institutions identified in the Ryan Report in which children were abused; if the question of additional payments by the orders was discussed; if he plans further meetings with the orders; and if he will make a statement on the matter.


Batt O’Keeffe
(Minister, Department of Education and Science; Cork North West, Fianna Fail)

I propose to take Questions Nos. 15, 22, 24 and 166 together.

On Thursday 4th June 2009, the Taoiseach, along with myself and other Cabinet colleagues, met with representatives of the Religious Congregations to begin the process of addressing with them the issues arising from the publication of the Report of the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse. The Taoiseach conveyed the view of the Government and indeed the wider public that further substantial contributions are required from the Congregations by way of reparation. Furthermore, the contributions need to be capable of being assessed by the public for their significance by reference to the full resources available to the Congregations and in the context of the costs of well over a billion euro being borne by the State. The Taoiseach asked the Congregations to revert with proposals in this regard.

The same group again met with the representatives of the various religious congregations on Wednesday 24th June at which the Religious Congregations reported on the progress they had made in compiling reports on their financial positions. It is expected that reports signed off on by their financial advisors will be submitted by the congregations to the Government by mid-July when a further meeting will be held.

The Taoiseach has stated that the Government would now move to appoint a panel of three independent persons to assess the material submitted by the congregations and report to Government as to the adequacy of these statements as a basis for assessing the resources of the Congregations.

Liz McManus
(Wicklow, Labour)

Question 18: To ask the Minister for Education and Science if he will adopt the Institutional Child Abuse Bill 2009, a Private Members Bill proposed by the Labour Party; and if he will make a statement on the matter

Batt O’Keeffe
(Minister, Department of Education and Science; Cork North West, Fianna Fail)

Following the publication of the Ryan Report the Taoiseach and members of the cabinet met with representatives of the survivors of abuse. Meetings were also held with the relevant religious congregations. At these meetings and through other submission a range of matters were raised including issues such as those raised in the proposed Bill referred to in the question. These matters will be considered fully by the Government with a view to giving a comprehensive response as soon as possible.

Liz McManus
(Wicklow, Labour)

Question 177: To ask the Minister for Education and Science the redress entitlement of a child in a case where they were in an institution providing for mothers and babies, were then fostered with the agreement of the mother and then abused by their foster parent; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Batt O’Keeffe
(Minister, Department of Education and Science; Cork North West, Fianna Fail)

During the passage of the legislation governing the establishment of the Redress Scheme (Residential Institutions Redress Act, 2002) through both Houses, the issue of including children who were in foster care was discussed and it was decided not to extend the legislation, as children in foster care were not in a residential institution. However, this statutory redress scheme was an additional benefit introduced by the Oireachtas for a particular category of persons and left unaffected the right of anybody to bring legal proceedings. Consequently, a person’s ineligibility to be considered for an award under the terms of the Redress Scheme does not effect their statutory right to pursue any other legal avenue which may be open to them.

Reply to Joan Burton TD.

Dear Joan,


Thank you for keeping us in the picture and your support is deeply

Appreciated by us all your invitation has being passed on

A correspondent will be in touch with the press office on behalf of Ireland’s newest community’s web portal, designed to reach all the residents associations and small communities in the country.

When finished this portal will encourage citizens to become reporters for their own communities and all this under the netzoners portal

Each “community reporter” will receive a Press ID



And will enjoy the support of hundreds of fellow correspondents through the country!


Coverage will be published on the blog www.machholz.wordpress.com as well

Best wishes

Thomas Clarke

For machholz.wordpress.com & netzoners


Message from Joan Burton TD.


Just to let you know, that the Labour Party Private Members Bill in respect of redress has now been entered by the Labour Party as a Private Members Bill and has been accepted as such by Government. Obviously Government has not allocated any time to it.

However, we have decided to allocate next weeks, Tuesday and Wednesday 7 to 8.30 each evening, of our last Private Members Time, our last Private Members Time before the summer recess, to debating our redress Bill.

In that context I would be grateful if you would let people you know, with an interest in the issue, know and also if they wish to come and hear some or all of the debate they will be very welcome.

They can either arrange to come and view the debate through my office or any other Labour Party TD or through Cathy Flanagan who will arrange for them to be admitted to the public gallery.

I hope that this will raise the profile of the various issues which the Bill seeks to redress.

I attach a summary of the Bill for your information.

Best regards

Joan Burton TD.

Deputy Leader of the Labour Party.

Sister Stanislaus Kennedy

Taken from www.alliancesupport.org

Sister Stanislaus Kennedy has apologised unreservedly to survivors of child abuse in Catholic-run institutions.

Sr Stan said the Sisters of Charity were sad, sorry and ashamed that children suffered physical, emotional and sexual abuse while under their care.

She also said that the order must now live up to its financial responsibilities.

 Sr Stan is a prominent campaigner for homeless people.

The order is holding a conference on social justice in Dublin today.

The Ryan report into institutional child abuse the economic downturn will be discussed at the conference.

Sr Miriam Hennessey of the Sisters of Charity told the conference that the findings of the report were ‘overwhelming and disturbing’ for all her nuns.

On behalf of the congregation, she apologised again to all past pupils for what took place in the institutions under the congregation’s care.

President Mary McAleese has described the institutional abuse of children as ‘a milestone of biblical proportions in Irish history’.

Addressing a conference organised, she said the abuse of some of the children in the nuns’ care was a sad chapter in their history, which calls for resilience, determination, humility and focus in the journey of amending and healing that lies ahead.

Comment from Machholz

While this apology is very welcome the fact is that the survivors of this injustice are

Still having to fight to get justice

They should not have to beg for help. A well thought out plan of action, that will meet the current needs of the survivors is desperately needed now!

The various groups that have sprung up all over the country are at best well meaning individuals but they do not have the necessary skills to meet with the challenges that have yet to be faced up to in the future

We are dealing, it must be remembered with well established organisations that have enormous resources, and can protect themselves very well indeed

we need to be equally competent with our dealings with these organisations if we are going to succeed in bringing this very sad chapter of Irish history to a close.

Tag Cloud