What is truth?


If you know about TTIP, you still need to read this. If you still don’t, YOUR REALLY MUST READ THIS! You will likely be aware of the steady anti democratic steps being taken across the western world, but this U.S.EU treaty, which mirrors one for the U.S./ Japan/Pacific to the far west, is so important that already well over 100,000 EU citizens have put their names to a petition to demand the EU puts the brakes on this whilst it is properly debated. It is being sold as a “trade agreement” between the US and the EU. However in addition to lowering health and safety for workers to the lowest level (the US- the EU actually has quite good worker protection), ie dropping to the lowest denominator, more seriously it intends to make large multinational companies SOVEREIGN. Yes you heard that right- TTIP plans to put large companies on an equal legal footing internationally with Sovereign Nation States. Which will mean that a company will be able to sue a country and its people for loss of profits, eg if they ban GM foods, or Monsanto seeds, etc- and for negative publicity from the choice the people dared to make! WORSE STILL, they now plan to ensure state legislation is passed by the multinationals BEFORE it is allowed to become law!!! Make no mistake folks- whilst Enda/FG/Labour as well as Creighton/Renua/Hobbs and Angela Merkel and Pres Obama ALL back TTIP- it is the biggest threat to democracy we have yet seen!!! Get informed. Wake up. Add your names to the EU citizens petition to stop this. It’s already years in development, and it’s now in the final stages….take action NOW.         

source: https://www.facebook.com/directdemocracyireland?fref=nf

According to a leaked European Commission proposal in the ongoing EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations, EU member state legislative initiatives will have to be vetted for potential impacts on private business interests.

Leaked proposal here: reconstructed_ec_proposal_regulatory_cooperation_march_2015.pdf

The proposal forms part of a wider plan for so-called “regulatory cooperation”. Civil society groups have already denounced earlier iterations of this plan as being a tool to stop or roll back regulation intended to protect the public interest. The new elements in the leaked proposal expand the problem, according to civil society organisations.

Civil society groups have condemned the “regulatory exchange” plan as an affront to parliamentary democracy. “This is an insult to citizens, elected politicians and democracy itself”, says Max Bank of Lobby Control.

The “regulatory exchange” proposal will force laws drafted by democratically-elected politicians through an extensive screening process. This process will occur throughout the 78 States, not just in Brussels and Washington DC. Laws will be evaluated on whether or not they are compatible with the economic interests of major companies. Responsibility for this screening will lie with the ‘Regulatory cooperation body, a permanent, undemocratic, and unaccountable conclave of European and American technocrats.

“Both the Commission and US authorities will be able to exert undue pressure on governments and politicians under this measure as these powerful players are parachuted into national legislative procedures. The two are also very likely to share the same agenda: upholding the interests of multinationals,” says Kenneth Haar of Corporate Europe Observatory.

“The Commission proposal introduces a system that puts every new environmental, health, and labour standard at European and member state level at risk. It creates a labyrinth of red tape for regulators, to be paid by the tax payer, that undermines their appetite to adopt legislation in the public interest,” says Paul de Clerck of Friends of the Earth Europe.

Screening under the regulatory exchange plan could take place from before a proposal is formally tabled until it is adopted, and on existing regulations, providing continuous opportunities to weaken and delay regulatory acts. Articles 9 and 11 detail how it would work.

“What’s perhaps most scary about this proposal is its potential application to existing regulation – not just paralyzing future legislation but sending us backward,” says David Azoulay at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). “Not only will it extend an outrageously burdensome process on future legislation, but any current legislation in the public interest that doesn’t sit well with trade interests on either side of the Atlantic could be subjected to the same process to make it conform to corporate interests.”


Comment: All this is coming from the same corporate dictatorship that has enslaved the entire Irish Nation!


Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: