What is truth?

This letter appeared om Awaken Longford …. Many of the Ministries in Ireland are not Sovereign but commercial entities…… nobody will supply answers as to why they are registered with Dun & Bradstreet ……………………….



Susan Gageby Denham

Chief Justice

The Supreme Court Office

Four Courts

Inns Quay

Dublin 7



Re: The High Court, Record No. …. ……

The High Court, Record No. …. ……

The High Court, Record No. …. ……

……. ….. –v- PERMANENT TSB


Greetings Susan Denham,


I am one of the sovereign people of Éire.

I am the Authorised Representative for and/or the Authorised Agent of the PLAINTIFF in the above matters.

Prior to the commencement of the above proceedings many efforts were made to resolve matters in the private and these matters may still be resolved in the private at some future date.

These efforts at resolution were undertaken against a backdrop of constant revelations regarding the activities of the Banking and Financial Institutions. From allegations of rate fixing to money laundering, predatory lending to breaches of regulatory requirements was enough cause to question the intent behind any utterance from these entities.

Perhaps the most bewildering performance was the role played by the Government, midnight meetings and deals, odious debt converted to sovereign debt, bailouts for the banks and austerity for the people. How was this allowed to happen?

To paraphrase from Bunreacht na hÉireann, “We, the people of Éire,” “seeking to promote the common good, with due observance of Prudence, Justice and Charity, so that the dignity and freedom of the individual may be assured,” “Do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves this Constitution”

According to www.supremecourt.ie the Constitution provides for a separation of powers in the form of the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary, presumably to ensure that “the common good” “observance of Prudence, Justice and Charity” and “the dignity and freedom of the individual” would not be usurped by any overly zealous individuals.

Additionally, Bunreacht na hÉireann assures us that “The State acknowledges that the Family is the basic primary group-unit of/for society according to nature, and that it is a moral institution which has inalienable invincible rights which are more ancient and higher than any human statute” (Article 41.1.1) and “the operation of free competition shall not be allowed so to develop as to result in the concentration of the ownership or control of essential commodities in a few individuals to the common detriment (Article 45.2.3) and “That in what pertains to the control of credit the constant and predominant aim shall be the welfare of the people as a whole” (Article 45.2.4).

If one was to reflect on the events of recent years while at the same time referencing the Articles of Bunreacht na hÉireann, it would be clear that the Government do have questions to answer and that one of these questions would have to be, How were these events permitted to occur?

Information which has recently been brought to the attention of this author may go some way to providing some possible answers.

The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation which has its headquarters in New Jersey, USA, offices worldwide and a listing on the New York Stock Exchange: DNB, provides the following information on their website, www.dnb.com    “D&B (NYSE:DNB) is the world’s leading source of commercial information and insight on businesses, enabling companies to Decide with Confidence for more than 170 years. Today, D&B’s global commercial database contains more than 200 million business records.”

Amongst the 200 million business records on the D&B’s global commercial database can be found the following listings: THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND, HOUSES OF THE OIREACHTAS Also Traded as Irish Parliament, An Taoiseach, Tanaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs & Trade, MINISTER FOR FINANCE, CENTRAL BANK & FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY OF IRELAND Also Traded as THE CENTRAL BANK Also Traded as FINANCIAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN’S BUREAU and the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Additional commercial businesses listed on the D&B database are contained in Appendix 1 attached.

It would appear that there are now numerous commercial entities in existence whose registered trading names are the names of various Government Departments. Could it be that there now exists a de-jure Government as provided for in Bunreacht na hÉireann and a de-facto Government comprised of various commercial entities?

If such a de-facto commercial Government exists it could explain why recent events unfolded as they did. Firstly the commercial THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND would have no more regard for Bunreacht na hÉireann and the sovereign people of Éire as would any other commercial entity like MICROSOFT or APPLE. Secondly just as the election of new officers to any corporate entity does not change the overall company policy, the election of new officers to the HOUSES OF THE OIREACHTAS would not change the overall company policy of THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND.

The bailout of financial institutions could be better viewed as something akin to a corporate takeover where THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND would have as its first priority the safeguarding of its newly acquired assets and not the concerns or wishes of the sovereign people of Éire.

If one were to have cause to complain to the MINISTER FOR FINANCE or THE CENTRAL BANK regarding the products or services of another corporate entity it would be similar to a customer of MCDONALDS making a complaint to BURGER KING. Both scenarios would in all likelihood result in an unsatisfactory and unpleasant outcome for the complainant.

While these examples may provide some explanation for the actions of THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND throughout recent events, they still leave a number of important questions unanswered.

Who or what are these corporate entities? Who are their Owners, Directors and Shareholders? Why aren’t they listed with the Companies Registration Office (CRO)? What country are they registered in? What are the Memorandums and Articles of Association of these companies? If an offence of impersonating a member of Garda Síochána carries a sentence of up to five years imprisonment, should these corporate impersonators not be subject to similar penalties for impersonating Government offices?

Perhaps the most important question to be asked is: Has a silent coup d’état occurred whereby the de-jure Democratic Government has been replaced by a de-facto Corporate Government or Corporatocracy?

Currently the most pressing questions are in relation to the above matters as follows. Were these matters filed with the corporate entity “Central Office of the High Court” to have motions heard by the corporate entity “Master of The High Court” prior to trial by the corporate entity the “Supreme Court”?

This is cause for grave concern and prior to proceeding any further with these matters, the following questions require answers:

In what capacity do you act?

  1. Do you act as part of a de-jure Judiciary as prescribed in Bunreacht na hÉireann?
  2. Do you act as part of a de-facto Judiciary trading commercially as corporate entities?
  3. In what capacity does the “Central Office of the High Court” act?
  4. In what capacity does the “Master of The High Court” act?
  5. In what capacity does the “Supreme Court” act?
  6. Do the entities listed at 4, 5 & 6 act as part of a de-jure Judiciary as prescribed in Bunreacht na hÉireann?
  7. Do the entities listed at 4, 5 & 6 act as part of a de-facto Judiciary trading commercially as corporate entities?
  8. What proofs, if any, are you prepared to supply in support of your responses to question 1 – 8 above?
  9. What actions, if any, do you propose to take to investigate the activities of the corporate entities listed in Appendix 1 attached?


Whilst the contents of this letter may contain information that you were previously unaware of, a response, at your earliest convenience, to these enquires would be most appreciated.

Yours without ill will and without vexation,

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: